Icat kipinäntehostin

[fazer78]

Tere!

Onkos kellään tietoa kyseisestä laitteesta? luin että sen pitäis vähentää päästöjä ja kulutusta. Sekä tuottaa enemmän tehoa tehostuneen palamisen johdosta. Jos on tietoa kyseisestä asiasta niin laitelkaa infoo.

 

[mkoo]

Liekkö se enemmän crossi-miesten vehkeitä, eikai ne super-hienot katupyörät sellasta kaipaa

 

[fazer78]

Jaa-a...tuolla Tokimoton sivuilla on siitä pieni tekstin pätkä...mahtaako puoletkaan luvatusta olla totta?

 

[willik]

Nologyn hotwires ajaa saman asian. Ja on halvempi.
kysellä voi www.kaasutinexpertti.fi

 

[Ytsför]

Artikkeli

Lainaus:
A typical claim is that the combustion with the device fitted is somehow "better" or "more complete". There is never however any detail as to what is meant by this. And it is a firmly established engineering fact that, on any reasonably modern engine under normal operating conditions, the burn is already at least 98% complete. The unburnt fuel in the exhaust (even before the cat) represents 1 or 2% at most of the input fuel. If you factor in the energy in the CO emissions, the figure still only rises to 3% maximum. So even if the fuel "saving" device could totally eliminate unburnt fuel and CO in the exhaust, and give an absolutely 100% complete burn, you would only save 3% of fuel. Claims that 10%, 20% or even more of the fuel is not burnt and escapes into the exhaust are entirely false - the unburnt fuel figure is higher when the engine is stone-cold, and at high load and speed conditions, but since the engine only spends a small fraction of its time under these conditions their contribution to overall fuel consumption is small.